Competition Markets Authority
class="gem-c-govspeak govuk-govspeak govuk-!-margin-bottom-0">
Why are we investigating the Vodafone / Three potential merger?
TheCMAinvestigates the impact of certain potential mergers and assesses how they could impact competition in the UK. This is to promote a fair and competitive environment, where businesses and the UK economy thrive, and consumers can be confident they are getting great choices and fair deals.
Competition can help to keep prices low, as well as provide an important incentive for businesses to improve their services.
What weve found so far
In its initial investigation (called a phase 1 investigation) which began in January 2024, theCMAfound that the merger, which would combine 2 of the 4 mobile network operators in the UK, could lead to a substantial lessening of competition on the basis that mobile customers might face higher prices and a reduction in quality.
This meant that a more detailed (phase 2) merger inquiry was required.
Provisional findings
On 13 September 2024, theCMApublishedprovisional findingson the Phase 2 investigation where an independent inquiry group provisionally concluded that the merger might lead to price increases for tens of millions of mobile customers, or see customers get a reduced service such as smaller data packages in their contracts.
The inquiry group found that:
-
higher bills or reduced services would significantly impact those customers least able to afford mobile services
-
a large number of consumers might have to pay more for improvements in network quality that they dont value
-
the deal could negatively impact wholesale telecoms customers such as Sky Mobile and Lebara which rely on the existing 4 network operators to provide their own mobile services
-
the deal would affect these wholesale customers by reducing available network operators to just 3, likely meaning they are less able to secure competitive terms and offer the best deals to retail customers
We noted that the merger could improve the quality of mobile services and bring forward the deployment of next generation 5G networks and services.
However, we considered:
- that the merger firm might not follow through on its proposed investment programme after the merger
- whether thoseimprovements, if delivered, would be as significant as claimed
Remedies working paper
On 5 November 2024, we announced our provisional view that the merger could go ahead if Vodafone and Three offer legally binding commitments (known as remedies) that address the concerns outlined in September.
The proposed remedies would require Vodafone and Three to:
- deliver their joint network plan which sets out the network upgrade and improvements they will make through significant levels of investment over the next eight years across the UK
- commit to retain certain existing mobile tariffs and data plans for at least three years, protecting millions of current and future Vodafone / Three customers (including customers on their sub-brands) from short-term price rises in the early years of the network plan
- commit to pre-agreed prices and contract terms to ensure that Mobile Virtual Network Operators can obtain competitive wholesale deals
What happens next?
Its important to remember that this working paper is provisional and the inquiry group is inviting feedback on these proposed remedies by 5pm on 12 November 2024.
Well publish our final decision before the statutory deadline on 7 December 2024.
How this merger investigation works
The Vodafone / Three case follows our previous process timeline for phase 2 investigations. In April 2024 we adopted a new process for phase 2.
This investigation follows these 6 key stages:
Our Phase 1 investigation
The CMA first carries out an initial review of the merger to determine whether there is a realistic prospect of a substantial lessening of competition. This is known as our Phase 1 investigation.
If the CMA isnt concerned about the merger, it clears it. But if there are competition concerns that are not solved following its initial review, the CMA carries out a more in-depth investigation, known as Phase 2.
In this investigation, the CMA completed its Phase 1 investigation in March 2024.
Phase 2 investigation begins
At Phase 2, the CMA will build on the work at Phase 1 and gather more evidence from the merging businesses and others to investigate potential issues with competition that could arise as a result of the merger.
The CMA will meet with the businesses proposing to merge and their representatives on site to learn more about their business.
Every Phase 2 inquiry is run by an appointed inquiry group. This is an independent panel made up of 3 to 5 people with a range of business, finance, economic and legal experience. They are responsible for making the final decision on the case.
For Vodafone / Three, the CMA began a Phase 2 investigation in April 2024. The inquiry group was appointed at the same time.
Issues Statement published
The Issues Statement shows the focus of the Phase 2 investigation and sets out what are called theories of harm, which are the potential concerns being investigated.
At this point anyone, including members of the public, is invited to share their views with the CMA.
Analysis of evidence
After publishing the Issues Statement, the CMA continues gathering and reviewing evidence. Hearings are held with the main parties (and sometimes third parties) to ask questions about the evidence received and explore key issues.
If the inquiry group thinks the merger could have a negative impact on competition, it will also start thinking about potential solutions to those concerns (known as remedies).
Provisional findings
Once the inquiry group has a good understanding of the business of the organisations proposing to merge, and a strong evidence base, it will publish the provisional findings.
This document outlines the provisional decision on the merger.
If there are concerns, the inquiry group will also send the merging businesses its thoughts on possible solutions, in a document referred to as a remedies notice.
Final report
This includes the final decision on the merger, including whether the inquiry group believes it would harm competition for consumers or businesses in the UK.
- if the inquiry group finds no competition concerns, the merger can go ahead as planned
- if the inquiry group finds that the merger may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition, it will decide how its concerns should be remedied; for example, this can include selling part of the business, prohibiting the merger altogether, or requiring the companies to commi