Competition Markets Authority
Case timetable
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 15 December 2021 | Non-confidential infringement decision published |
| September 2021 to October 2021 | Advanz Pharma, Cinven and HgCapital filed appeals in the Competition Appeal Tribunal against the CMAs findings in the Infringement Decision. The CMA will defend the appeal |
| 29 July 2021 | Infringement Decision issued: unfair pricing abuse in relation to Liothyronine tablets |
| July 2020 | Supplementary statement of objections issued |
| June 2019 | High Court judgment rejecting Advanz Pharmas judicial review application |
| January 2019 | Supplementary statement of objections issued |
| November 2017 | Statement of objections issued |
| November 2017 | Decision whether to proceed with the investigation |
| May 2017 | Decision to proceed with the investigation |
| October 2016 to April 2017 | Initial investigation, information gathering, including issuance of formal or information requests and parties responses. CMA analysis and review of parties responses to information requests. Potential state of play meetings with parties under investigation |
| October 2016 | Investigation opened |
Change log
The following changes have been made since the case was opened in October 2016:
| Date of change | Reason for change | Change made to |
|---|---|---|
| July 2020 | Decision to issue supplementary statement of objections | Date of issue of supplementary statement of objections |
| June 2019 | Advanz brought judicial review proceedings; the High Court rejected its application | Date of judgment and explanation of the decision |
| January 2019 | Decision to issue supplementary statement of objections | Date of issue of supplementary statement of objections |
| January 2018 | Decision to focus investigation exclusively on liothyronine and de-prioritise investigation into another product | Focussing of investigation exclusively on liothyronine |
| 16 October 2017 | Additional time for evidence gathering and analysis | Date of decision on whether or not to proceed with the investigation extended from September 2017 to November 2017 |
| 20 March 2017 | Additional time for evidence gathering and analysis | Date of decision on whether or not to proceed with the investigation extended from April 2017 to May 2017 |
| 20 January 2017 | Additional time for evidence gathering and analysis | Date of decision on whether or not to proceed with the investigation extended from February to April 2017 |
Competition Appeal Tribunal judgment
8 August 2023: The Competition Appeal Tribunal has upheld the CMAs findings on liability in all respects, amending the fine to 84.2 million.
- Press notice: CMA defeats legal challenge in medicine pricing case (8.8.23)
- Competition Appeal Tribunal judgment (8.8.23)
Non-confidential infringement decision
15 December 2021: The CMA has published a non-confidential version of the decision in which the CMA fined Advanz Pharma, Cinven and HgCapital over 100 million for their involvement in the charging of excessive and unfair prices in the supply of liothyronine tablets in the UK.
- (15.12.21)
- (15.12.21)
- Annex 2 (redacted in full)
- (15.12.21)
- (15.12.21)
- (15.12.21)
- (15.12.21)
- (15.12.21)
- Annex 8 (redacted in full)
Infringement decision
29 July 2021: The CMA has found competition law breaches in relation to the supply of 20mcg Liothyronine tablets in the UK.
- Press notice: CMA fines pharma firm over pricing of crucial thyroid drug (29.7.21)
Supplementary statement of objections
On 10 July, the CMA issued a supplementary statement of objections. The statement addresses issues arising from the Court of Appeals judgment of 10 March 2020 in the phenytoin litigation a case which relates to excessive and unfair pricing in the pharmaceuticals sector.
The CMA continues provisionally to find that Advanz Pharma breached UK and EU competition law from at least 1 January 2009 to at least 31 July 2017 by charging excessive and unfair prices for Liothyronine tablets in the UK.
High court ruling on Advanz Pharmas judicial review application
On 5 March 2019, Advanz Pharma applied to the High Court for a judicial review of the CMAs decision not to suspend the next procedural step in its investigation into excessive and unfair pricing for liothyronine tablets. On 13 June, the High Court dismissed Advanzs application, enabling the CMA to continue with its investigation.
Supplementary statement of objections
On 30 January 2019, the CMA issued a supplementary statement of objections revising certain aspects of its provisional findings in the statement of objections.
Through this supplementary update, the CMA has slightly altered its investigation period, provisionally finding that Advanz Pharma (formerly Concordia) breached UK and EU competition law from at least 1 January 2009 to at least 31 July 2017 by charging excessive and unfair prices for Liothyronine tablets in the UK.
Between January 2009 and July 2017, the price paid by the NHS for liothyronine tablets rose from 15.15 to 258.19, a rise of 1,605%, while production costs remained broadly stable. During that period, Advanz was the only supplier of liothyronine tablets in the UK.
Statement of objections
On 21 November 2017 the CMA issued a statement of objections alleging that Concordia has breached UK and EU competition law by charging excessive and unfair prices in relation to the supply of liothyronine tablets in the UK.
- Press release: Drug company accused of abusing its position to overcharge the NHS (21.11.17)
Notes
- The investigation is under Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998 (CA98).
- No conclusion should be drawn that there has been an infringement of competition law at this stage and the recipients of the supplementary statement of objections will now have a further opportunity to respond to the allegations.
- The CMA will consider any representations it receives before any decision is taken as to whether competition law has in fact been infringed.
- Further detail of the CMAs procedures in Competition Act 1998 cases is available here: