Competition Markets Authority
Case timetable
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 23 May 2024 | Judgment of the Competition Appeal Tribunal setting aside the infringement decision, following which the CMA is no longer pursuing director disqualification proceedings and has asked the High Court to dismiss the application |
| 5 June to 4 August 2023 | Appeal and the competition law issue of the director disqualification proceedings to be heard before the Competition Appeal Tribunal between 5 and 27 June and 27 July and 4 August |
| 7 February 2023 | Publication of non-confidential infringement decision |
| 14 November 2022 | Competition Appeal Tribunal made case management orders regarding the transferred aspect of the disqualification, listing it alongside the main appeal proceedings |
| 18 October 2022 | High Court made an order transferring the consideration of competition condition of the director disqualification proceeding to the Competition Appeal Tribunal |
| 2 September 2022 | CMA issued proceedings in the High Court of Justice seeking the disqualification of 7 company directors |
| April 2022 | Lexon, Alliance, Cinven and Advanz filed appeals in the Competition Appeal Tribunal against the CMAs findings in the Infringement Decision. The CMA will defend the appeals. The final addressee of the Infringement Decision, Medreich, has not appealed the findings and has paid its fine |
| 3 February 2022 | Infringement Decision Issued: anti-competitive agreement |
| Q1 2022 (estimate) | Final decision on case outcome |
| 22 January 2021 | Decision on administrative priorities grounds to close investigation of whether alleged separate agreements between each of (1) Alliance Pharmaceuticals and Focus and (2) between Focus, Lexon and Medreich in themselves individually broke competition law, while continuing investigation of alleged overarching agreement between Alliance Pharmaceuticals, Focus, Lexon and Medreich. |
| 1 January 2021 | Following the end of the EU Exit Transition Period on 31 December 2020, the CMAs investigation continues on the basis of the Chapter I prohibition in the Competition Act 1998 only (see CMA Guidance on the functions of the CMA after the end of the Transition Period) |
| 20 July 2020 to Spring 2021 (estimate) | Considering written and oral representations on the Statement of Objections and further evidence gathering and analysis |
| 7 April to 20 July 2020 | Case paused in order to reallocate resources to ensure that the CMA is able to focus on urgent work during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic |
| November 2019 to 7 April 2020 | Considering written and oral representations on the Statement of Objections and further evidence gathering and analysis |
| August 2019 to October 2019 | Receipt of written and oral representations on the Statement of Objections |
| May 2019 | Statement of objections issued |
| Q2 2019 (estimate) | Decision on whether to issue a statement of objections for certain alleged anti-competitive agreements and/or concerted practices and certain parties |
| July 2018 to Q1 2019 | Further investigation including further information gathering in relation to certain alleged anti-competitive agreements and/or concerted practices and certain parties. CMA analysis and review of information gathered |
| October 2017 to June 2018 | Initial investigation and information gathering. CMA analysis and review of information gathered |
| October 2017 | Investigation opened |
Change log
The following changes have been made to the case timetable since it was first published:
| Date of change | Reason for change | Change made to timetable |
|---|---|---|
| 17 November 2021 | Additional time needed to consider parties responses to the Statement of Objections | Date for CMA final decision on case outcome changed to Q1 2022 |
| 23 June 2021 | Additional time needed to consider parties responses to the Statement of Objections | Date for CMA final decision on case outcome changed to Autumn 2021 |
| 20 July 2020 | Case resumed | Date for CMA final decision on case outcome changed to Spring 2021 |
| 7 April 2020 | Case paused in order to reallocate resources to ensure that the CMA is able to focus on urgent work during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic | Timetable paused |
| 28 March 2019 | Additional time needed to analyse information | Date for CMA decision on whether to issue a statement of objections changed from Q1 2019 to Q2 2019. |
Update on the Competition Appeal Tribunals (CAT) judgment
The Competition Appeal Tribunal handed down its judgment on 23 May 2024. The CAT found in favour of the appellants and set aside the CMAs infringement decision. The full ruling can be found on the CATs website.
Court proceedings previously seeking director disqualification
Update 12 September 2024
12 September 2024: Given the Competition Appeal Tribunals judgment of 23 May 2024, the CMA is no longer pursuing director disqualification proceedings and has asked the High Court to dismiss the application.
Update 17 November 2022
17 November 2022: In September 2022, the CMA issued proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts seeking the disqualification of 7 directors.
On 18 October 2022, the High Court made an order transferring the competition law issue in these proceedings (namely, whether the directors companies committed a breach of competition law) to the Competition Appeal Tribunal. The transfer was made so this could be heard and determined alongside the related appeals brought by Lexon, Alliance, Cinven, and Advanz, against the CMAs infringement decision and the penalty imposed. The High Court will wait for the decision of the Competition Appeal Tribunal before progressing the CMAs disqualification case further.
At a case management conference on 14 November 2022, the Competition Appeal Tribunal made case management orders addressing the transferred aspect of the disqualification proceeding. This order will enable the transferred aspect of the disqualification proceeding to be considered by the Tribunal at the same time as the appeals.
Update 2 September 2022
2 September 2022: The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has issued proceedings in the High Court of Justice, Business and Property Courts seeking the disqualification of the following company directors:
-
Pritesh Sonpal, a director of Lexon UK Holdings Ltd. from 21 February 2018 to 9 April 2021 and Lexon (UK) Ltd. from 14 December 2000 and 9 April 2021
-
Peter Butterfield, a director of Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Alliance Pharma plc from 22 February 2010 to date
-
John Dawson, a director of Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd. from 16 September 1996 to 30 April 2018 and Alliance Pharma plc from 23 December 2003 and 30 June 2019
-
Mark Cresswell, a director of Focus Pharmaceuticals Ltd. from 28 October 2002 to 1 October 2014 and Focus Pharma Holdings Ltd. from 19 October 2007 to 1 October 2014
-
Roland Brown, a director of Focus Pharmaceuticals Ltd. from 28 October 2002 to 1 October 2014 and Focus Pharma Holdings Ltd. from 19 October 2007 to 1 October 2014
-
Graeme Duncan, a director of Focus Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Focus Pharma Holdings Ltd., Mercury Pharma Group Ltd., and Concordia Investment Holdings (UK) Ltd. from 31 December 2016 to 8 March 2018 and from 30 November 2018 to 12 January 2022
-
Debangshu Dey, a director of Medreich plc from 1 April 2016 to 31 August 2017
The proceedings arise from the CMAs decision dated 3 February 2022 that between June 2013 and July 2018, Alliance Pharmaceuticals, Focus (now owned by Advanz, previously owned by the private equity firm Cinven), and Lexon were involved in an arrangement that that had the object of restricting competition in the supply of prochlorperazine 3mg dissolvable or buccal prescription-only medicine