GovWire

In 2021 the DRCF established an Algorithmic Processing workstream to explore the impact of algorithms across our industries and regulatory remits.

As part of this workstream, we launched two separate research projects - one looking at the harms and benefits posed by algorithmic processing (including the use of artificial intelligence), and another looking at the merits of algorithmic auditing, as a way of documenting risks and assuring stakeholders that an algorithmic system behaves and is governed as intended.

In undertaking these projects, the DRCF members sought input from a range of stakeholders, including representatives from academia, civil society, government, industry, the public sector, and consumer groups.

In the next financial year (see DRCF workplan 2022 to 2023), we intend to undertake further activity in the field of algorithmic processing, looking more closely at how regulators might support algorithmic transparency, as well as what role regulators might play in the algorithmic auditing ecosystem.

See press release:UKs digital watchdogs take a closer look at algorithms as plans set out for year ahead

Call for input

We are now launching a call for input alongside the publication of these two papers and we welcome and encourage all interested parties to engage with us in helping shape our agenda.

Questions of interest for Paper 1 The Benefits and Harms of Algorithms

• What are your overall reflections on the findings of this paper?
• What other areas could the DRCF focus on?
• Which area of focus does the DRCF have the most potential to influence and which would you prefer the DRCF prioritised?
• What outputs would consumers and individuals find useful from the DRCF to assist them in navigating the algorithmic processing ecosystem in a way that serves their interests?
• Do you have any evidence on the harms and benefits of algorithmic systems you would like to share with the DRCF?

Questions of interest for Paper 2 Auditing Algorithms

With reference to the hypotheses included at the end of this paper:

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of each of these hypotheses?
• Which of these hypotheses would you prefer the DRCF tested and explored further?
• Are there any other actions the DRCF should consider undertaking in the algorithmic auditing space?

Stakeholders are invited to respond by email drcf.algorithms@cma.gov.uk by Wednesday 8 June 2022.

23 September 2022: Following our call for inputs, we received 31 responses from a broad range of stakeholders, detailing their views on the findings and conclusions set out in the papers. We will use the feedback gathered through this exercise to inform the next stage of the DRCF project on algorithmic processing and relevant work across the individual regulators. The response to call for input submissions document summarises the responses to each paper and sets out our next steps.

