GovWire

Policy paper: OTS Review of tax simplification

Office Of Tax Simplification

July 18
10:53 2022

Review of simplification: Approach and interpretation

Order a copy

Review of simplification: Approach and interpretation - web copy

Order a copy

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need aversion of this document in a more accessible format, please email ots@ots.gov.uk.Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

This review, commissioned by the previous Chancellor and the Financial Secretary, sets out the things that drive tax complexity, and some ways that officials making policy can work to prevent or mitigate that complexity.

Tax complexity

Complex or unclear tax rules stifle productivity and mean more cost for taxpayers and government; and unintended incentives skew business and investment decisions and create the potential for distortions.

Simplification is not a policy in itself, but rather a principle to support the taxpayer through effective policy design and implementation. Its purpose is to help make tax compliance easy and cheap for taxpayers and for HMRC, as well as to support taxpayers to make the best choices in their business and family affairs, through better understanding of the tax system.

Sometimes policy objectives are inherently complex, and officials need to look for ways to mitigate the impact on taxpayers, including enhanced guidance, technology, making better use of intermediaries (such as banks, platforms and other engagers), and increased awareness.

A review of tax simplification

In November 2021, HM Treasury published the first five-yearly review of the OTS, concluding that the need for the OTS remains undiminished.

In the governments response to the Treasurys review of the OTS, the Financial Secretary to the Treasury, Lucy Frazer QC MP, said the Treasurys review gave:

a clear endorsement of the importance of the role of the OTS and the work it does to advise the Chancellor on making the tax system simpler and easier for taxpayers to interact with.

As recommended in the Treasurys review, the previous Chancellor and the Financial Secretary commissioned the OTS to carry out a review to define tax simplification and set out our aims and objectives.

This Review of Simplification is in response to that and discusses the OTSs priorities and aims for the next five years, reaffirming our focus on those who need simplicity the most: individuals and small businesses.

Bill Dodwell,OTSTax Director said:

The OTS welcomes this opportunity to set out what we mean by tax complexity, and the ways we, and government officials and ministers, should look to prevent or mitigate it.

Recommendation

The OTS is not a policy-making body; thats for officials and ministers. With that in mind, this report has only one recommendation: that the principle of simplification should be better embedded in the general tax policy making process. Whilst undoubtedly officials will not set out to make complex law, sometimes the policy itself or other drivers will make it so.

It suggests a framework of questions which officials and ministers may wish to consider when developing and re-visiting policy to look for complexity and mitigation:

  1. Are the rules, their purpose and their consequences easy to understand and predict?
  2. Are the tax rules logical, with their purpose understood and the outcomes of choices clear and running with the grain of the lives and businesses they encompass? Do they add complexity when taken in aggregate with the immediate and wider existing rules?

  3. Are the rules and their administration taking advantage of modern developments, including technology?
  4. Can technology shoulder some of the administrative or process burden for taxpayers? Can technology help manage the complexity without undermining informed choice? Is this technology available and accessible for the majority, and how are the digitally excluded or challenged served? Are tax policies capable of being implemented in a digital manner?

  5. Is it easy enough to comply with the rules?
  6. As well as the core

Related Articles

Comments

  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comments:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This


Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: