GovWire

Independent report: SACN vitamin D and health report

Public Health England

December 11
07:14 2023

SACN vitamin D and health report

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@phe.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

SACN reviewed the evidence on vitamin D and health to see if UK dietary recommendations, set in 1991, were still appropriate.

In a change to previous advice, SACN is now recommending:

  • a reference nutrient intake (RNI) of 10 micrograms of vitamin D per day, throughout the year, for everyone in the general population aged 4 years and older
  • an RNI of 10 micrograms of vitamin D per day for pregnant and lactating women and population groups at increased risk of vitamin D deficiency
  • a safe intake of 8.5 to 10 micrograms per day for all infants from birth to 1 year of age
  • a safe intake of 10 micrograms per day for children aged 1 to 4 years

The RNI and safe intakes were developed to ensure that the majority of the UK population has enough vitamin D to protect musculoskeletal health, all year round.

SACN did not take account of sunlight exposure in making recommendations because of the number and complexity of factors that affect skin synthesis of vitamin D.

The RNI and safe intakes refer to intake from all dietary sources:

  • natural food sources
  • fortified foods (including infant formula milk)
  • supplements

They also refer to average intakes over a period of time, such as a week, and take account of day-to-day variations in intake.

You can view documents related to the consultation on the draft report. These documents include a substantial number of consultation comments received and SACNs responses.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published its Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for vitamin D. You can view the joint note by SACN and EFSA which explains why their respective recommendations are not directly comparable.

Published 21 July 2016
Last updated 11 December 2023 +show all updates
  1. A sentence referring to an outdated press release was removed and a broken link was fixed.

  2. First published.

Related Articles

Comments

  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comments:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This


Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: