GovWire

Press release: Bradford man caught using fake references in security licence appeal

Security Industry Authority

February 13
10:39 2023

On Thursday 9 February 2023 Shakeel Ahmed was sentenced at Bradford Magistrates Court to a 12-month community order with a 150-hour unpaid work duty. He was also ordered to pay 600 prosecution costs and a victim surcharge of 95. The sentence follows Ahmeds guilty plea on 11 October 2022 to forging documents in a fraudulent appeal against an SIA decision to reject his door supervisors licence application.

Mr Ahmed applied for an SIA licence to work in the private security industry on 12 March 2021. The SIA rejected his licence application due to previous criminality. Mr Ahmed sent four supposedly independent character references to the SIA in support of an appeal. The SIAs decision team realised that the character references were either fraudulent or forged, due to suspicious similarities between them.

The SIAs criminal investigations team began an investigation into the sources of the character references on 23 August 2021. One supposed source told SIA investigators that he didnt know Mr Ahmed. Another said that although he knew of Mr Ahmed, he had not provided a character reference for him. An SIA investigator confirmed that the proposed reference and signature did not belong to him.

A third man confirmed to SIA investigators that he was a friend of Mr Ahmed. However, he supplied a statement stating that he had not given him a reference.

On 25 November 2021 SIA investigators interviewed Mr Ahmed under caution. During the interview Mr Ahmed repeatedly denied that he had forged the character references. Eventually he admitted that he had produced four independent character references and forged the signatures on three of them. His intention was to use the forgeries to appeal against the SIAs decision to refuse him a licence.

Jenny Hart, the SIAs criminal investigations manager said:

The purpose of the SIAs licensing regime is to protect the public. The SIA applies significant scrutiny during the decision process to assess whether someone is fit and proper to hold an SIA licence. Mr Ahmeds previous criminality had led to the decision that he was not suitable to hold a licence. Forgery is a serious criminal offence, and I commend the vigilance of SIA colleagues in detecting this fraud.

Notes to editors:

Further information:

Related Articles

Comments

  1. We don't have any comments for this article yet. Why not join in and start a discussion.

Write a Comment

Your name:
Your email:
Comments:

Post my comment

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This


Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: