GovWire

Guidance: Inspecting Cafcass: framework

Ofsted

October 4
08:30 2024

The inspection framework, introduced in April 2021, sets out how Ofsted will inspect the quality and effectiveness of Cafcasss private and public law practice with children and families and the impact of leaders on private and public law practice with children and families. In evaluating the impact of the service, the inspection will also evaluate how well Cafcass positively influences the effectiveness of the family justice system both locally and nationally.

Updates to this page

Published 17 March 2021
Last updated 4 October 2024 +show all updates
  1. In the Notifying Cafcass and requesting information section, we have clarified how the provider can request any adaptations to the inspection process due to a protected characteristic, or any reasonable adjustments due to a disability.

  2. This framework has been updated to clarify that, when applying the handbook, inspectors will take appropriate action to comply with Ofsteds Equality Act duties, clarification on the opportunities for the centre to discuss and/or provide information on potential equalities duties, including reasonable adjustments for individuals, clarification regarding Ofsteds updated arrangements for publishing the report, quality assurance and handling concerns and complaints in line with Ofsteds new complaints process in the timeframe sections, references to Ofsteds pausing process, and minor revision to the Inspection activity and gathering evidence section (what inspectors will take into account when evaluating childrens experience).

  3. Additional guidance on deferring an inspection, inspector conduct during inspections, when and how the provider can raise issues, concerns or complaints during and after the inspection, supporting the well-being of the providers managers and staff during inspections and visits, attendance at keeping in touch meetings, discussions with staff and feedback meetings and who the provider may share provisional and final inspection outcomes with.

  4. Correction to the wording of the relevant (outstanding) evaluation criteria.

  5. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page

Recent Comments

Follow Us on Twitter

Share This


Enjoyed this? Why not share it with others if you've found it useful by using one of the tools below: